{"id":10779,"date":"2026-08-29T23:43:16","date_gmt":"2026-08-29T15:43:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/q8bbzjnpm5.wpdns.site\/?p=10779"},"modified":"2026-08-29T23:43:16","modified_gmt":"2026-08-29T15:43:16","slug":"new-amorphous-alloy-dry-type-transformer-debuts-propelling-the-transformation-of-the-power-industry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/news\/new-amorphous-alloy-dry-type-transformer-debuts-propelling-the-transformation-of-the-power-industry\/","title":{"rendered":"\u65b0\u3057\u3044\u30a2\u30e2\u30eb\u30d5\u30a1\u30b9\u5408\u91d1\u4e7e\u5f0f\u30c8\u30e9\u30f3\u30b9\u304c\u767b\u5834\u3057\u3001\u96fb\u529b\u696d\u754c\u306e\u5909\u9769\u3092\u63a8\u9032\u3057\u307e\u3059"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On a hot summer afternoon, an energy auditor equipped with a handheld power quality checker was walking through a textiles factory in southern Vietnam. The 1,000 kVA distribution transformer at the factory had been running at a load of only about 35 percent for almost the entire day &#8211; weekend shifts, part-time production lines, and air conditioning usage only on hot afternoons. The readings on the power logger showed what the owner of the factory had thought &#8211; the transformer consumed a larger quantity of energy being kept in the activated state than it was supplying to the machines. The reason for the problem was no-load losses &#8211; a sneak thief. The very essence of the problem is that new amorphous alloy transformers were created specifically to prevent it.<\/p>\n<p>The invention of the amorphous alloy, dry transformer is a considerable shift in efficiency perception by the power industry, not in terms of a few clicks here and there, but in terms of a drop in the no-load losses for 60-80 percent compared to traditional silicon steel cores. This paper explains what amorphous alloy transformers are, how they work, how they function in reality, and what the numbers mean for customers.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Brief explanation: The amorphous alloy dry transformer utilizes the same design of fireproof cast resin or VPI transformer of dry type, but the core of the transformer is made of amorphous alloy instead of silicon steel. Because of the absence of grains in the alloy, it becomes easier to magnetize the transformer and as a result, the no-load loss is reduced by 60 to 80%.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10780\" src=\"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/New-Amorphous-Alloy-Dry-Type-Transformer-Debuts-Propelling-The-Transformation-Of-The-Power-Industry.webp\" alt=\"New Amorphous Alloy Dry Type Transformer Debuts Propelling The Transformation Of The Power Industry\" width=\"1448\" height=\"1086\" \/><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 id=\"what\">What Is an Amorphous Alloy Transformer?<\/h2>\n<p>An amorphous metal transformer is defined as a transformer utilizing a core made from amorphous metal, which is blended from iron, boron and silicon, cooled rapidly from molten state, about 1 million \u00b0C per second, rendering it cool without forming crystalline structure. The result is obtained in the form of very thin pieces of ribbon, the thickness being generally 0.02-0.03mm, with randomly arranged atoms. The importance of randomness of core is that because there are no grains to interrupt the magnetic field, the core loses less energy from hysteresis during each magnetization cycle.<\/p>\n<p>In case of a dry-type transformer, this low-loss core is combined with either air or resin cooling system, allowing to obtain a safe and highly efficient unit in light load operation. However, historically, the main disadvantage of this type of metal was purely mechanical; amorphous metal ribbons have proven to be more complicated in handling than steel plates as they are brittle and more susceptible to stress. However, modern production, use of step-lap cores and careful fixing of parts have resolved the issues; therefore, the technology has progressed from pilot projects into actual practical use.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"why\">Why the Core Material Changes Everything<\/h2>\n<p>No-load losses are the energy used by the transformer to keep the core magnetized and are of course constant throughout the day and night over the weekends and holidays also. Silicon-steel cores require extensive magnetization and need much stronger magnetic fields to reverse the magnetic domains during each half cycle of alternating current, while amorphous cores require much less energy for the magnetization process. For example, when looking at a distribution transformer rated at 1000 kVA:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u30b3\u30a2\u6750\u6599<\/th>\n<th>Ribbon Thickness<\/th>\n<th>No-Load Loss (1,000 kVA)<\/th>\n<th>Relative Loss<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Grain-oriented silicon steel (CRGO)<\/td>\n<td>0.23\u20130.30 mm<\/td>\n<td>2,000\u20132,600 W<\/td>\n<td>100% baseline<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>High-grade CRGO (thin gauge)<\/td>\n<td>0.18\u20130.23 mm<\/td>\n<td>1,500\u20132,000 W<\/td>\n<td>~75\u201385%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Amorphous alloy (2605SA1)<\/td>\n<td>0.02\u20130.03 mm<\/td>\n<td>800\u20131,100 W<\/td>\n<td>~35\u201345%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The maximum possible improvement to be gained by customers of transformers today is realized in connection with no-load losses, which can be reduced by 60\u201380%.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10781\" src=\"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/How-the-New-Dry-Type-Design-Is-Built.webp\" alt=\"How the New Dry-Type Design Is Built\" width=\"1448\" height=\"1086\" \/><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"design\">How the New Dry-Type Design Is Built<\/h2>\n<p>The manufacturing process of an amorphous alloy dry-type transformer takes place in six major stages. There is no need to go deep into understanding the construction and the principles of how they work to see that those units are more expensive than other types of transformers and that they function differently:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Core-making process: The making of an amorphous alloy dry-type transformer starts with preparing a core made from an amorphous ribbon which is wound up and subsequently annealed in a magnetic field.<\/li>\n<li>Core assembly: In the second step, the obtained ribbon is placed under clamping plates made of soft material so that it does not experience stress and thus remain effective.<\/li>\n<li>Winding: For low-voltage vertebrae, copper foil or aluminium foil are used, while high-voltage transformers are produced by means of a vacuum-casting process or the VPI method.<\/li>\n<li>Curing: In the process of curing, the resin coils are dried in an oven, while the VPI coils are baked.<\/li>\n<li>Assembly: The assembly of the core, windings, cooling channels, and terminals according to tolerance specifications takes place.<\/li>\n<li>Testing: All transformers had to pass tests for no-load loss, loaded loss, impedance, partial discharge, and dielectric according to IEC 60076-11.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The major difference of the construction of an amorphous alloy transformer from that of silicon-steel transformers lies in the mechanical aspect: the core should never be shocked or dropped, as mechanical stress impairs its efficiency.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"losses\">No-Load vs Load Loss: Where the Savings Live<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Loss Component<\/th>\n<th>When It Occurs<\/th>\n<th>Amorphous Dry-Type<\/th>\n<th>Conventional Dry-Type<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>No-load loss (core)<\/td>\n<td>Whenever energized<\/td>\n<td>800\u20131,100 W<\/td>\n<td>2,000\u20132,600 W<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Load loss (windings)<\/td>\n<td>Proportional to load\u00b2<\/td>\n<td>Similar range<\/td>\n<td>Similar range<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total at 100% load<\/td>\n<td>Continuous duty<\/td>\n<td>~9,500\u201311,500 W<\/td>\n<td>~10,500\u201312,500 W<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total at 30% load<\/td>\n<td>Typical industrial average<\/td>\n<td>~2,100\u20132,600 W<\/td>\n<td>~3,000\u20133,700 W<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Observe the scenario: the amorphous benefit has its greatest impact in the places where numerous transformers are utilized \u2014 in partial loading. The load loss is the same with all technologies as far as it relies on the winding copper and the current rate and not on the core material. Thus, the smaller the average load ratio, the bigger the profit from the amorphous core.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"payback\">The Payback Math: Real Numbers<\/h2>\n<p>Let us consider the numbers for a 1,000 kVA dry-type amorphous transformer and a conventional silicon-steel unit at 12 cents per kilowatt hour over 8,760 hours per year:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u30a2\u30a4\u30c6\u30e0<\/th>\n<th>Conventional<\/th>\n<th>Amorphous<\/th>\n<th>Difference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\u7121\u8ca0\u8377\u640d\u5931<\/td>\n<td>2,300 W<\/td>\n<td>950 W<\/td>\n<td>1,350 W saved<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Annual energy saved<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>11,826 kWh<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Annual cost saved<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>$1,419<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>First-cost premium<\/td>\n<td>$30,000 (typical)<\/td>\n<td>$36,000 (typical)<\/td>\n<td>+$6,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Simple payback<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>\u2248 4.2 years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-year saving<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>\u2014<\/td>\n<td>\u2248 $22,000+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Therefore, the time taken to recoup the investment is less than four years, leading to benefits of sixteen years afterwards. This is the math behind the current rise of amorphous transformers from being a mere curiosity to becoming a part of the specifications for products. In regions with high tariffs like Africa and Asia where the price can go up to between 18 cents and 25 cents, one can pay back the investment in just 2-3 years.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"compare\">Amorphous vs Silicon-Steel: Comparison Table<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u8996\u70b9<\/th>\n<th>Amorphous Alloy<\/th>\n<th>Grain-Oriented Silicon Steel<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\u7121\u8ca0\u8377\u640d\u5931<\/td>\n<td>60\u201380% lower<\/td>\n<td>\u30d9\u30fc\u30b9\u30e9\u30a4\u30f3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Core cost<\/td>\n<td>Higher material + handling<\/td>\n<td>Lower<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Core rigidity<\/td>\n<td>Brittle, stress-sensitive<\/td>\n<td>Robust, handles abuse<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u9a12\u97f3<\/td>\n<td>Similar or slightly higher magnetostriction<\/td>\n<td>\u6a19\u6e96<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Best operating point<\/td>\n<td>Light \/ variable loads<\/td>\n<td>Heavy sustained loads<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Repair tolerance<\/td>\n<td>Core replacement complex<\/td>\n<td>Repairable in field<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Market position<\/td>\n<td>Green \/ efficiency-first projects<\/td>\n<td>Commodity, lowest capex<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 id=\"applications\">Applications Transforming the Industry<\/h2>\n<p>Technology has influenced the electrical field in four distinct areas. Utility companies have been using amorphous core transformers in rural and residential distribution networks where the capacity is mainly between 10% and 30%, which is the range in which the no-load loss is maximum. Developers of renewable energy sources have been implementing them at solar parks and wind farms, where there is inconsistent production, so the transformer is powered intermittently. Data centers, which operate 24\/7, meet their energy efficiency requirements with the packaging of these transformers. Similarly, commercial buildings trying to achieve green certification utilize materials based on amorphous cores because in every single case, the mechanism behind this practice can be described in the following way: when the transformer is powered but lightly loaded, the core is the most expensive component on the electricity bill.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"pricing\">Pricing and Market Availability<\/h2>\n<p>Although amorphous dry-type transformers are priced higher than silicon-steel variants, the difference is dissipating due to the increase in production of ribbons. The following prices are provided for cast-resin amorphous devices, though these values vary by configuration, producer and location.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u5b9a\u683c<\/th>\n<th>Amorphous Dry-Type (FOB)<\/th>\n<th>Conventional Dry-Type (FOB)<\/th>\n<th>\u30d7\u30ec\u30df\u30a2\u30e0<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>250 kVA<\/td>\n<td>$9,000\u2013$15,000<\/td>\n<td>$6,500\u2013$11,000<\/td>\n<td>~30\u201340%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>400 kVA<\/td>\n<td>$12,000\u2013$20,000<\/td>\n<td>$9,000\u2013$16,000<\/td>\n<td>~25\u201335%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>630 kVA<\/td>\n<td>$17,000\u2013$28,000<\/td>\n<td>$13,000\u2013$22,000<\/td>\n<td>~25\u201335%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1,000 kVA<\/td>\n<td>$25,000\u2013$45,000<\/td>\n<td>$20,000\u2013$38,000<\/td>\n<td>~20\u201330%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2,500 kVA<\/td>\n<td>$55,000\u2013$95,000<\/td>\n<td>$45,000\u2013$85,000<\/td>\n<td>~15\u201325%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Higher ratings are accompanied by lower percentage surcharges since the cost of ribbon per kVA declines as sizes of cores go up. The majority of known brand producers have already commercialized their line of amorphous devices with distribution becoming wider outside China, Japan and India; however, it is still very inconsistent, with delivery times ranging from 60 up to 120 days for certain countries.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"brands\">Brands, Suppliers, and Quality Signals<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>\u30d6\u30e9\u30f3\u30c9<\/th>\n<th>Amorphous Offering<\/th>\n<th>Market Focus<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\u65e5\u7acb\u30a8\u30ca\u30b8\u30fc<\/td>\n<td>Amorphous distribution transformers<\/td>\n<td>Global premium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ABB<\/td>\n<td>Amorphous core distribution line<\/td>\n<td>Global premium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u30b7\u30fc\u30e1\u30f3\u30b9<\/td>\n<td>Amorphous distribution solutions<\/td>\n<td>Global premium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u30b7\u30e5\u30ca\u30a4\u30c0\u30fc\u30a8\u30ec\u30af\u30c8\u30ea\u30c3\u30af<\/td>\n<td>Efficiency-driven distribution units<\/td>\n<td>Global premium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\u30b9\u30d3\u30a2\u30f3\u96fb\u529b<\/td>\n<td>Amorphous dry-type (SCB series)<\/td>\n<td>Value, export<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>International companies like Hitachi Energy, ABB, Siemens, and Schneider Electric were the pioneers in the field of amorphous core technology and they are still heavily involved in the construction of large electricity grids today. However, for commercial and industrial customers, the much higher costs associated with using these brands (in some cases up to 60% higher than that of the Chinese equivalents) can be difficult to rationalize. Jiangsu Subian Electric Power has launched its own line of amorphous dry-type transformers (the SCB series), achieving the unique combination of 60\u201380% reduction of no-load losses, with the utmost levels of safety provided by cast resin and IEC 60076-11 documentation, all at prices significantly lower than those offered by the leading brands.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10782\" src=\"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Practical-Cautions-Before-You-Buy.webp\" alt=\"Practical Cautions Before You Buy\" width=\"1448\" height=\"1086\" \/><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"cautions\">Practical Cautions Before You Buy<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Look at the loss certificate. If a manufacturer claims their amorphous-core technology has been used, you will need to check that the no-load loss figure is between 60% and 80% lower than the values in their silicon-steel product catalog, and you will need to refer to actual test documents.<\/li>\n<li>Make sure you know the type of ribbon. Request information on the amorphous material type (for example, 2605SA1), as only high-quality ribbons can provide the largest possible loss reduction.<\/li>\n<li>Think about handling and packaging. Amorphous cores are susceptible to stress, so you must insist on proper packaging and delivery instructions.<\/li>\n<li>Ensure that the load is the same as the one for which the amorphous core was manufactured; if your transformer operates under load conditions for the majority of time, it may be better to avoid using amorphous cores and calculate losses based on your tariff.<\/li>\n<li>Set partial-discharge restrictions. For cast-resin units, be sure that the partial discharge is less than 10 pC at 1.1 \u00d7 the rated voltage according to IEC 60076-11 standards.<\/li>\n<li>Keep noise levels in mind. Amorphous cores may have the magnetostriction effect, so be sure to evaluate the guaranteed noise levels of the unit before its installation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"faq\">\u3088\u304f\u3042\u308b\u8cea\u554f<\/h2>\n<h3>How much energy does an amorphous alloy transformer save?<\/h3>\n<p>An amorphous core gives a combined 60-80% reduction in no-load losses compared to a grain-oriented silicon steel core. Moreover, a 1,000 kVA transformer grants constant energy savings of 1,000-1,500 watts (equal to about 8,760-13,140 kWh every year), resulting in more than $ 1,050 to 1,580 annual savings given the energy cost of $0.12\/kWh.<\/p>\n<h3>Are amorphous alloy transformers worth the extra cost?<\/h3>\n<p>Typically, yes, as long as a unit operates under low load for long periods. The average premium for the price of a transformer is between 20% and 40%, with the payback time running from 3 to 5 years, followed by 15 years of savings. However, if a unit functions at full loads continuously, load losses prevail and the premium is not repaid, which means all calculations must be carried out before buying.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the difference between amorphous and silicon steel cores?<\/h3>\n<p>Amorphous metal is an alloy made of iron, boron, and silicon rolled under conditions so precise that it lacks a crystal structure (only 0.02-0.03 mm in thickness) whereas silicon steel is rolled crystalline sheets with a thickness of 0.23-0.30 mm. The absence of grain boundaries in amorphous metal leads to a noticeable drop in hysteresis losses.<\/p>\n<h3>Do amorphous dry-type transformers cost more than conventional dry-types?<\/h3>\n<p>Indeed, they usually cost 20-40% more. For instance, the price of a cast-resin unit equals $25,000-45,000 for a 1,000 kVA unit, and a regular one is about $20,000-38,000. The prices vary depending on the brand, specifications, and availability. It is important to pay additional money for the unit only when the energy savings exceed the cost of the transformer.<\/p>\n<h3>Are amorphous alloy transformers available in dry-type configurations?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, both epoxy vacuum-cast and VPI (vacuum-pressure-impregnated) variants have been developed. It should be noted that these designs enable manufacturers to produce devices with a capacity of 2,500 to 3,150 kVA at the voltage of 10\u201335 kV.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"references\">\u53c2\u8003\u6587\u732e<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/webstore.iec.ch\/en\/publication\/63660\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">IEC 60076-11: Dry-Type Power Transformers<\/a> \u2014 The international standard for dry-type transformer ratings, insulation classes, and tests.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ieee.org\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">IEEE<\/a> \u2014 Publisher of transformer standards and technical literature on amorphous core technology.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.energy.gov\/eere\/femp\/energy-conservation-program-standards-distribution-transformers\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">US DOE Distribution Transformer Standards<\/a> \u2014 Efficiency regulations that make amorphous cores financially attractive in North America.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nema.org\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">NEMA<\/a> \u2014 North American standards body tracking transformer efficiency classes.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hitachienergy.com\/products-and-solutions\/transformers\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Hitachi Energy Transformers<\/a> \u2014 Manufacturer reference on amorphous and conventional core technology.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/\">Jiangsu Subian Electric Power Co., Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 Manufacturer offering amorphous-core dry-type transformers in the SCB series.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"conclusion\">\u7d50\u8ad6<\/h2>\n<p>The release of amorphous alloy dry-type transformers signifies more than just a product launch \u2014 it reveals the industry&#8217;s most distinct solution to the question of where distribution efficiency is going to come from in the next twenty years. By eliminating 60-80% of the no-load loss in comparison with silicon-steel cores, these devices enable financial benefits that accumulate over decades, while the typical payback is at 3-5 years at the prices that are paid for utility service and 2-3 years in the case of expensive electricity. The innovation makes procurement radically different since it benefits the users who take an ownership outlook rather than an immediate cost approach. If you expect that your transformer will often work at low loads, for example, in a mill, a remote detection and feed system, a data center, or a solar power plant, you should choose the amorphous type.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On a hot summer afternoon, an energy auditor equipped with a handheld power quality checker was walking through a textiles factory in southern Vietnam. The 1,000 kVA distribution transformer at the factory had been running at a load of only about 35 percent for almost the entire day &#8211; weekend shifts, part-time production lines, and air conditioning usage only on hot afternoons. The readings on the power logger showed what the owner of the factory had thought &#8211; the transformer consumed a larger quantity of energy being kept in the activated state than it was supplying to the machines. The reason for the problem was no-load losses &#8211; a sneak [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10780,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10779"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10990,"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10779\/revisions\/10990"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/subian-electric.com\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}