Solicitar una cotización
Noticias

Cómo Elegir el Transformador Sumergido en Aceite Adecuado: Una Guía para Compradores

Looking at the utility bill and production reliability record, facilities engineer is trapped in a situation where a plant runs round-the-clock operations, drawing an energy peak of 1.8 MW and suffering from three production losses (due to under-voltage trips) during this fiscal year so far. A utility company proposes a dedicated supply of a 33 kV network which will require a transformer installation at the entry. One of the sales representatives has claimed that a 2,000 kVA transformer should be suitable for the plant’s needs. The engineer is aware that “should” does not mean to size a transformer correctly and wrong kVA consumption would lead to long-term expenses and a wrong voltage ratio will neutralize any benefit of the proposed transformer installation. Thus, she requires a system to select a correct oil-filled transformer.

This buyer’s guide serves as the required system. It guides through a series of the eight decisions that define the transformer selection process, such as kVA selection, voltage ratio determination, parameters and characteristics of a transformer, tap range, loss level, and many others with all respective numbers and standards.

In brief, when selecting an oil-filled transformer, eight important variables come into play: (1) kVA size should account for maximum peaks plus a margin of 15–25 percent; (2) voltage ratios must be aligned with the service provider’s and the planter’s line; (3) impedance is frequently in the bracket of 4.5–8 percent based on class and coordination of fault level; (4) vector groups must be synchronized with the earthing of the system and the phase’s degree; (5) tap range is set to ±2 times 2.5 percent off-circuit for stable grids or ±8 times 1.25 percent on-circuit for weak grids; (6) losses class of the transformer is established in accordance with GB 20052 or EU Ecodesign by capitalizing on the losses; (7) cooling should be chosen between ONAN or ONAF based on the load factor; and (8) the optional equipment includes Buchholz relay, PRD, temperature monitor, and Vibrothermometer.

How To Choose The Right Oil Immersed Transformer A Buyer's Guide

Tabla de Contenidos

  1. Decision 1: Sizing the kVA Rating
  2. Decision 2: Voltage Ratio and Taps
  3. Decision 3: Impedance
  4. Decision 4: Vector Group
  5. Decision 5: Tap Changer Choice
  6. Decision 6: Loss Class and Efficiency
  7. Decision 7: Cooling Mode
  8. Decision 8: Accessories and Protection
  9. El Método de Selección en Seis Pasos
  10. Brands and Price Guidance
  11. Preguntas Frecuentes
  12. Referencias
  13. Conclusión

Decision 1: Sizing the kVA Rating

The decision that leads all the rest is sizing, because every later decision takes place in the context of a rating envelope. The right way:

  • Determine or assess peak demand. Use one-year metering data (e.g. load study) or, in case the site is new, determine connected load and apply a diversity factor (475 for commercial and 0.5-0.8 for industrial load).
  • Convert to kVA. kVA = kW/power factor. For the power factor equal to 0.9 the peak demand of 1.8 MW converts into 2,000 kVA; at the power factor of 0.8 – into 2,250 kVA.
  • Always use the actual or predicted power factor, not 1.0.
  • Introduce the growth margin. Add 15-25% for load growth over the planning horizon of 5-10 years. For instance, 2,000 kVA becomes 2,300-2,500 kVA.
  • Round to the standard rating. Standard kVA increments in this vicinity are 1600/2000/2500 and 3150.
Computed kVA (load study) Standard rating to order Typical application
Up to 400 kVA 400 / 500 kVA Small commercial, villages
400–800 kVA 630 / 800 / 1,000 kVA Factories, malls
800–1,300 kVA 1,000 / 1,250 / 1,600 kVA Medium industry
1,300–2,200 kVA 2,000 / 2,500 kVA Large plants, campuses
Above 2,200 kVA 3,150 kVA and up Substations, heavy industry

Choose the nearest appropriate rating that exceeds the calculated value. For this case, the inferred value in our case was 2,500 kVA.

Two common sizing mistakes are costly. Oversizing (e.g., using a 3,150 kVA unit for a needed 2,000 kVA) causes unnecessary expenses with no-load losses incurred throughout the life of the unit – the no-load loss of a 3,150 kVA unit (of approximately 4.4) is equal to $3100 per year at $0.08 per kWh. Undersizing causes overload operation, leads to insulator aging, and makes trips happen at peak. The right size is defined by the load study, not the round number from the dealer.

Decision 2: Voltage Ratio and Taps

The voltage ratio has to be equal on both ends of the system: the voltage from the utility and the voltage in the bus. The most common pairs are given below:

Feed voltage Load-side bus Typical unit
33 kV 11 kV 33/11 kV distribution
35 kV 10.5 kV 35/10.5 kV power
22 kV 11 kV 22/11 kV distribution
11 kV 4 kV 11/0.4 kV pole or pad mount
6.6 / 6.3 kV 4 kV 6.3/0.4 kV industrial

The range of the taps is determined on the high-voltage side and compensates for both the change of utility’s voltage and the voltage drop from the transformer. The case when voltage supply is constant with an accuracy of ±2.5% can be performed using off-circuit taps with position ±2 × 2.5%. In situations when supply is weak and/or load changes, an on-load tap-changer with regulation of ±8 × 1.25% maintains needed control. Economically speaking, OLTC increases the cost of the transformer by 15-30%, which is reasonable only when there are actually changes in voltage.

Decision 3: Impedance

The factor of impedance (short-circuit voltage, UK%) determines two factors which can be in conflict with each other: voltage regulatory features and short-circuit current. The lower impairment is associated with stronger regulation, but at the same time it gives rise to bigger short-circuit current. On the other hand, the higher the impedance is the smaller the short-circuit current will be, but the voltage drop will be bigger. The general rule is to implement the transformer that is compatible with the protection and switching equipment already in use:

  • Distribution transformers (≤1,000 kVA): 4 – 4.5% is the norm;
  • Midsize transformers (1,6 – 10 MVA): 6% – 8% is the average; 7.5% is a common specification;
  • Heavy transformers (>10 MVA): 8% – 14%, the higher the power the higher the impedance.

The improper impedance can be a hazard of coordination. If the impedance chosen is too small, the transformer will provide the short-circuit current that will be beyond the ability of the circuit breaker to clear.

Decision 4: Vector Group

The vector group definition encompasses the winding configuration and phase displacement of the transformer as well as its earthing configuration and parallel operation requirements. Two of the most common vector groups used in oil-immersed transformers are:

  • Dyn11: Delta configuration on the high side and star configuration on the low side (with the neutral lead-out from the transformer). This vector group designation is normally used for distribution transformers (e.g., 11/0.4 kV) operating in either single-phase or three-phase circuits.
  • YNd11: Star configuration on the high side (with the neutral lead-out from the transformer) and delta configuration on the low side. This vector group designation is common for power transformers (e.g., 35/10.5 kV) feeding the grounded side through the neutral of the transformer.

The importance of the vector group becomes evident when paralleling two or more units. Two transformers connected to the same bus must have the same angle of phase displacement as well as matching impedances equal to ±7.5%. If the vector groups are different, then circulating currents are established causing overheating of transformers, which is a costly problem that can be avoided by checking the nameplate.

8 key decisions

Decision 5: Tap Changer Choice

According to experts, tap changer is the sole moving part of transformer. The decision of selecting taps is related about reliability.

Tipo Typical range Operación Cost impact Mantenimiento
Off-circuit (DETC) ±2 × 2.5% Desenergizado solamente Línea base None beyond inspection
On-load (OLTC), oil-immersed resistor ±8 × 1.25% or ±6 × 1.67% Under load +15–30% 50,000–100,000 ops
OLTC, vacuum type ±8 × 1.25% Under load +20–35% 150,000–200,000 ops

If the power supply is stable and load is constant, off-circuit taps can be employed. If on-load regulation is required, the power supply must vary more than ±2.5% in case the load is unstable or the process cannot function due to undervoltage events. The difference in price ($6,000-12,000) of 10 MVA unit seems insignificant compared to the loss caused by the prolonged case of undervoltage.

Decision 6: Loss Class and Efficiency

Most lifetime costs are assessed in the loss category. Two loss measurements commonly used are no-load loss (P0, continuing all day) and load loss (Pk, dependent on the square of load factor). Follow recommendations:

  • Stick to the applicable standards: Check GB 20052-2020 in China, EU Ecodesign Regulation 548/2014 in Europe and U.S. DOE 10 CFR Part 431 because they have a ceiling limit for losses which is highly useful.
  • Value the difference: Each kW of P0 would be worth tariff × 8,760 h × project life. Each kW of Pk would be worth tariff × 8,760 h × (average load factor)² × project life.
  • Select low-loss class in case of high load factor: With P0 values 60-70% lower with using amorphous-core transformer, an investment can be paid off within 6-12 years and would continue to give profit.

Some statistics on 1,000 kVA unit: Low-loss technology has approximately 1.1 kW lower P0 than S11, which is about $770/year at $0.08/kWh, $19,000 to pay during 25 years against $3,000-$6,000 to pay initially.

Load factor S11 no-load loss (1,000 kVA) Amorphous no-load loss Annual saving @ $0.08/kWh
0.3 (light) 1.7 kW 0.6 kW $770
0.6 (average) 1.7 kW 0.6 kW $770
0.9 (heavy / 24/7) 1.7 kW 0.6 kW $770

The no-load loss remains similar irrespective of the load factor. This means that savings stays constant. High operating hours ensure that the investment in unforgiving Premium gets quickly recovered.

Decision 7: Cooling Mode

When putting a transformer in cooling mode, it will determine the thermal limit and the allowable overload. The following indicates the current standards and their interpretations:

  • ONAN: Oil and air are used naturally to cool the transformer. This is the most basic type of cooling, the simplest, quiet and without any failure components.
  • ONAF: Fans are added in addition to oil for cooling. This increases power by 20 to 30 percent with the use of the fans, which is only suitable for overloads or intermittent loads.
  • OFAF/ODAF: The forced cooling method with the use of the fans for the biggest transformers – when the heat cannot be removed using the natural convection cooling.

If your load factor is smaller than about 0.8 and you have only few peaks – choose ONAN. If you expect to have short-term overloads often – choose ONAN/ONAF: in such a case your 1,000 kVA distribution transformer could reach 1,250 kVA with the help of fans. Make sure the overload map checks against IEC 60076-7.

Cooling mode Base rating Short-term overload headroom Hardware
ONAN 100% (nameplate) Typically 120–130% for 1–2 h per IEC 60076-7 Radiators only
ONAN/ONAF 100% with fans off +20–30% with fans on Radiators + fans
OFAF / ODAF Forced cooling rating Limited by winding hot-spot Pumps + fans

Decision 8: Accessories and Protection

The list of accessories is brief, it is compulsory in servicing and is frequently the most crucial point to tell the difference between the incident and catastrophe:

  • Buchholz (gas) relay: Slow-gas alarming and fast-oil-surge trip for conservator-type devices of more than ~1 MVA. Wire it and do the tests.
  • Pressure relief device: Releases the tank from internal pressure; size it according to the device.
  • Oil and winding temperature indicators: With the alarms and trips set according to the 65K rise budget.
  • Oil level gauge: Low level makes windings open; check it during the quarterly check-up.
  • Silica gel breather: Dehumidifies the air that enters the conservator; change silica gel if it is already pink.
  • Oil containing: Bund or a pit sized to accommodate the full volume of oil, as prescribed by IEC 61936-1 and local regulations.

None of these items costs much compared to the device and together, they convert the oil-immersed transformer from a fire threat to the managed asset. Budget 1–3% of the unit price for the entire protection set.

El Método de Selección en Seis Pasos

El Método de Selección en Seis Pasos

  • Loading study: maximum kW, power factor, load factor, growth plan → potential kVA.
  • Voltage coordination: supply voltage, bus voltage, earthing, interconnection requirements → ratio and phase group.
  • Fault study: short-circuit capacity, switchgear ratings → impotency.
  • Voltage quality decision: supply stability and load volatility → type and range of tap changers.
  • Costing of losses: tariff and load factor → type of losses (S11, S13, amorphous, or regulated hallmark losses).
  • Equipment and cooling system: overload plan, security, containment strategy → final configuration.

Make sure to perform all these steps in order and you’ll write the specification. The main shortcut — asking for pricing before actually applying steps 1-4 — is the reason of many unfortunate purchases because it gives all the power to those responding the letter first.

Brands and Price Guidance

Marca Origen 1,000 kVA 2,500 kVA 10 MVA
Hitachi Energy Japan/Global $22,000–$34,000 $38,000–$55,000 $55,000–$82,000
ABB Switzerland/Global $20,000–$31,000 $35,000–$52,000 $52,000–$78,000
Siemens Energy Germany/Global $21,000–$32,000 $36,000–$53,000 $50,000–$75,000
Schneider Electric France/Global $19,000–$29,000 $33,000–$48,000 $48,000–$72,000
Jiangsu Subian Electric Power China $14,000–$22,000 $22,000–$34,000 $28,000–$48,000

Global corporations provide solutions with specialized engineering, field-testing experience, and global service capabilities, while offshore producers provide IEC-compliant products at very competitive rates. After assessing risks, the maintenance of the expense is reliable for important items, while the cost-saving alternative for mass production is usually feasible.

Jiangsu Subian Electric Co. Ltd is a Chinese manufacturer of oil pumps producing distribution transformers and power transformers with voltage ratings of 35–110 kV in line with IEC 60076 specifications. Every unit’s technical reports, compliance with the GB 20052 standards, and no-load voltage regulation capability are part of the experience acquired by the company. Product details and certificates are at subian-electric.com.

Preguntas Frecuentes

How do I calculate the kVA I need?

kVA = maximum kW / power factor, plus 15 to 25 percent growth margin rounded to a standard rating. For instance, 1.8 MW at 90 percent power factor equals 2,000 kVA; with 25 percent growth margin equals 2,500 kVA. Whenever possible, use measured peak data; for new sites, add up the connected load and use a diversity factor that varies from 0.3 to 0.8, depending on the type of facility.

What voltage ratio should I choose?

Ensure your bus operating voltage at the low voltage side matches with the utility voltages on the high voltage side e.g., 33/11 kV or 35/10.5 kV or 22/11 kV or 11/0.4 kV. Get a confirmation of the operating voltage in writing from the utility company before placing the order; note that changing from the 33 kV voltage system to the 35 kV voltage system is not a straightforward task and requires redesign.

Do I need an on-load tap changer?

It only applies if your voltage is really fluctuating. If the utility is holding steady within ± 2.5 percent, and your load is constant, off-circuit taps at ± 2 by 2.5 percent are adequate. On the other hand, if the grid is weak, load fluctuations are rather large, or your process is sensitive in terms of undervoltage, the extra cost of an OLTC of 15–30 percent is made back by a single avoided lost production.

How much does the right transformer cost?

In general terms, quoting from a supplier, prices are FOB $6,000 to $16,000 for the 500 kVA transformer, $14,000 to $34,000 for the 1,000 kVA transformer, $22,000 to $55,000 for the 2,500 kVA transformer, and finally $28,000 to $82,000 for 10 MVA, depending on the type, manufacturer, and size of the transformer. Transport, installation and civil work fees range between 15 to 40%, depending on the locality.

What is the difference between Dyn11 and YNd11?

The standard combination for distribution units that provide single- and three-phase loads with neutral is Dyn11. For 35/10.5 kV power transformers, the YNd11 combination applies as the high voltage side is connected to the ground via the neutral of the transformer. The choice of connection type depends on the earthing arrangement and requirements for parallel operation.

Referencias

Conclusión

An oil-immersed transformer requires the input of eight different input requirements, instead of just a single input in terms of cost. If sized, matched with other components, and specified properly, your transformer will become and remain a silent asset for about 25 years. If these steps are neglected and haste is shown in this process, the transformer becomes a constant headache.The following are the key points that you must take into account when specifying your oil-immersed transformer:

  • Start with an appropriate load study and leave 15-25% margin; transformer kVA size calculator is only a first step in finding out the required transformer kVA.
  • Make sure you know the ratio, impedance and vector group characteristics of you transformer before inviting offers.
  • You should only buy an OLTC for maintaining a varying voltage level; OLTC increases the cost of the transformer by 15-30%.
  • Real cost should be calculated for power loss in transformers; usually, a low-loss transformer pays off over the years.